Skip to content
Home » Methodological Issues in Measuring the Impact of Interventions Against Female Genital Cutting

Methodological Issues in Measuring the Impact of Interventions Against Female Genital Cutting

    Methodological Issues

    in Measuring the Impact of Interventions Against

    Female Genital Cutting

    Ian Askew, Associate Director for Africa, Frontiers in Reproductive

    Health Program Population Council Nairobi, Kenya

    Version: March 4th 2003

    Ian Askew is a social scientist by training, and has 20 years

    of international experience in the field of reproductive health,

    including over 12 years living and working in sub-Saharan Africa.

    He is a Senior Associate with the Population Council, and heads

    the Council’s office in Nairobi, Kenya. As the Associate Director

    for Africa of the Council’s Frontiers in Reproductive Health program,

    Ian also directs numerous research projects that seek to improve

    the quality of reproductive health services throughout the region.

    Since 1994, this program has included several diagnostic and intervention

    research studies into FGC in several African countries.

    Abstract

    With increasing efforts being made to introduce systematic interventions

    for encouraging abandonment of female genital cutting (FGC) comes

    the need to better understand how such interventions work and what

    effects they have. Many interventions are based on theoretical models

    of behavior change and so studies to evaluate them should develop

    indicators appropriate to the type of behavior change anticipated.

    Systematic evaluations need also to use some form of quasi-experimental

    design to be able to attribute change to the intervention and not

    to any ‘natural’ change in FGC behavior or other activities that

    may be concurrent. A sustained change in the prevalence of FGC is

    the ultimate indicator and there are several ways this can be measured,

    although with many limitations given intimate nature of the practice.

    Moreover, appropriate sample sizes must be calculated and used be

    able to draw valid conclusions. Many of those implementing FGC interventions

    are not familiar with such basic research principles and so there

    is an urgent need to ensure that projects are well designed so that

    valid conclusions concerning their true effectiveness can be drawn.